DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JRE
Docket No. 2019-13
2014
16 Janvuer
—_— a le ae te Ce
Dear SipmiRiaiemtias
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
tates Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 16 January 2014. Your allegations of error and
= we ;
reculations and procedures applicable to th 2
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Bo
consisted of your application, together with all mate
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, it considered
the enclosed advisory opinion from the Director, Secretary of
the Navy Council of Review Boards and your counsel’s response
thereto.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion...
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the panel members will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Ete 9
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5545 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2014, Your injustice were reviewed in accordan regulations and procedures applicabl i ¢o llegations of error and this Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1266 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 2 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO1266-14 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR865 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board: Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2075 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, tthe burden is on the applicant to ‘demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0337 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) dated After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2703 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7927 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4268 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously congidered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. when applying for a correction of an official naval Consequently, record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3277 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1336 RCT dated 16 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5153 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.